Abstract
Progressive prosecutors have been acclaimed as the new hope for change in the criminal legal system. Advocates and scholars touting progressive prosecution believe that progressive prosecutors will use their power and discretion to address systemic racism and end mass incarceration. Just as this hope has arisen, however, so have concerns that meaningful change cannot be enacted within the criminal system by the very actors whose job it is to incarcerate. This Article highlights these concerns by looking at the bail reforms enacted by four different progressive prosecutors and analyzes the initial promises made, the actions taken to reform and eliminate monetary bail, and the resulting impacts on pretrial incarceration rates and existing racial disparities. This analysis shows how these prosecutors failed to deliver on their promises of reduced incarceration and more equitable treatment in the criminal system, and examines why these efforts often resulted in a shift to more conservative rhetoric and refocused efforts to incarcerate. Finally, this Article will use bail reform to show why progressive prosecutors are not a reliable method for transforming the criminal legal system due to their lack of transparency and accountability, role as political and adversarial actors, and lack of power to dismantle the carceral state.
Recommended Citation
Sarah Gottlieb, Progressive Facade: How Bail Reforms Expose the Limitations of the Progressive Prosecutor Movement, 81 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1 (2024).Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol81/iss1/3
Included in
Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons