The current cash bail system works in a way that punishes poverty. In Robinson v. California, the Supreme Court held that it is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment to punish an individual for a status or condition. Poverty is a status. The cash bail system is unconstitutional under Robinson and the Eighth Amendment because it punishes the status of poverty. Similar to drug addiction, poverty “may be contracted innocently or involuntarily or it might even take hold from the moment of a person’s birth.” Kalief Browder had no control over his family’s financial position. Yet, this financial position kept him locked away for more than 1000 days. An affluent individual in Browder’s position would have been able to afford the $3000 cash bail, and thus, would have been released from pre-trial custody. Because of this reality, the current bail system functions in a way that punishes defendants on the basis of their economic status. This Note demonstrates that the current cash bail system criminalizes the economic status of poverty. Because of this, the criminal cash bail system violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. Throughout this Note, the terms “bail” and “bond” are used interchangeably. Part I of this Note examines the Eighth Amendment, as well as the current structure and statistics surrounding the United States criminal bond system. Part II examines Robinson v. California, Powell v. Texas, and the effect of these two decisions on Eighth Amendment jurisprudence. Finally, Part III analyzes the constitutionality of the criminal cash bail system under Robinson.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.