Virginia Law Review Online
In this short essay, I argue that Facebook’s adoption of the alternative-facts frame potentially contributes to the divisiveness that has made social media misinformation a powerful digital tool. Facebook’s choice to present information as “facts” and “alternative facts” endorses a binary system in which all information can be divided between moral or tribal categories—“bad” versus “good” speech, as Sandberg put it in her testimony to Congress. As we will see, Facebook’s related-articles strategy adopts this binary construction, offering a both-sides News Feed that encourages users to view information as cleaving along natural moral or political divisions.
Sarah C. Haan, Facebook's Alternative Facts, 105 Va. L. Rev. Online 18 (2019), http://www.virginialawreview.org/volumes/content/facebooks-alternative-facts.
Business Organizations Law Commons, Communications Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Law and Politics Commons