Abstract
As states begin to loosen their COVID-19 restrictions, public debate is underway about what public health measures are appropriate. Many states have some form of mask-wearing orders to prevent the spread of COVID-19 infection. Public health guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization has conflicted. From a public health point of view, it is not clear what the right answer is. In the absence of directives, individuals are also making their own choices about mask use. At a time when public health measures, like shelter-in-place orders and social distancing, are being used to stop the spread of coronavirus, wearing masks can be seen as a form of solidarity and desire not to infect others. Similarly, not wearing a mask can also be a political statement of sorts. Additionally, black men wearing masks have reported being asked to leave stores and fearing for their own safety. This Article provides an overview of the legal and policy landscape and focuses on the potential for policing against black Americans when mask mandates are in place. Despite the public health benefits of mask usage, due to mask mandates likely being enforced discriminatorily, we advise caution against mask mandates.
Recommended Citation
Robert Gatter & Seema Mohapatra, COVID-19 and the Conundrum of Mask Requirements, 77 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. Online 17 (2020), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr-online/vol77/iss1/2
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Law and Society Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons