Abstract
The United States Supreme Court recently issued a fractured decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 142 S. Ct. 1906 (June 15, 2022), a classic David v. Goliath clash between a worker and employer. Can arbitration agreements be used to eliminate group or representative actions brought against employers, where the plaintiff worker is serving as a bounty hunter for the State? Although the majority clearly holds that a worker’s individual claims must be sent to arbitration pursuant to a predispute arbitration agreement, the splintered opinions leave some uncertainty regarding what happens to the representative claims of the other workers. Using the Star Wars universe, this Article clarifies and critiques flaws in the Court’s ruling. The decision provides a new hope and blueprint for protecting the rights of workers and consumers around the country.
Recommended Citation
Imre S. Szalai, Boba Fett, Bounty Hunters, and the Supreme Court’s Viking River Decision: A New Hope, 80 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. Online 97 (2022), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr-online/vol80/iss3/1
Included in
Contracts Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Litigation Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons