Document Type
Response or Comment
Publication Title
AJOB Neuroscience
Publication Date
2022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2022.2082585
Abstract
We support protecting privacy and freedom, both generally and in carceral settings. Yet we remain skeptical that expanding so-called “neurorights” achieves these aims (cf. Bublitz 2022). Instead, it may inflate human rights in ways that diminish the ability to enforce them, overlook the ways in which incarceration is at odds with other human rights, and raise questions of whether neurotechnologies can violate such rights in the ways Ligthart et al. imply.
Recommended Citation
Shannon Fyfe, Elizabeth Lanphier & Andrew Peterson, Neurorights for Incarcerated Persons: Should We Curb Inflation?, 13 AJOB Neuroscience 165 (2022).
Included in
Health Law and Policy Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons